Verizon, like most ISPs, prefers to balance their DNS server traffic via local, automatic assignments. Verizon DNS servers are often listed elsewhere as 4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.2, 4.2.2.3, 4.2.2.4, and/or 4.2.2.5, but those are actually alternatives to the CenturyLink/Level 3 DNS server addresses shown in the table above. Verizon DNS Servers & Other ISP Specific DNS Servers
Here are several more public DNS servers from major providers.ĭNS servers are referred to as all sorts of names, like DNS server addresses, internet DNS servers, internet servers, DNS IP addresses, etc.
You still need an ISP to connect to for access-DNS servers just translate between IP addresses and domain names so that you can access websites with a human-readable name instead of a difficult-to-remember IP address.
#Adguard dns servers free#
If, on the other hand, you want to use the DNS servers that your specific ISP, like Verizon, AT&T, Comcast/XFINITY, etc., has determined is best, then don't manually set DNS server addresses at all-just let them auto assign.įinally, in case there was any confusion, free DNS servers do not give you free internet access. If that's what you're interested in, make sure you read through the FAQs on the DNS provider's site to make sure it's going to do (or not do) what you're after. Know, however, that not all DNS servers avoid traffic logging. Other common reasons to use DNS servers from a third party is to prevent logging of your web activity so that you can have a more private browsing experience, and to circumvent the blocking of certain websites. Many people complain that their ISP-maintained DNS servers are sluggish and contribute to a slower overall browsing experience. If you can reach the website with the IP address, but not the name, then the DNS server is likely having issues.Īnother reason to change DNS servers is if you're looking for better performing service. An easy way to test for a DNS server issue is by typing a website's IP address into the browser. One reason you might want to change the DNS servers assigned by your ISP is if you suspect there's a problem with the ones you're using now. These servers are also available as DNS over HTTPS, TLS, and QUIC, as well as DNSCrypt. Non-filtering servers are available if you're not interested in blocking anything: 94.140.14.140 and 2a10:50c0::1:ff.
#Adguard dns servers plus#
This configuration you're approaching, is identical to how Microsoft Domains need to be supported.There are also "Family protection" servers (94.140.14.15 and 2a10:50c0::bad1:ff) that block adult content, plus everything included in the "Default" servers. Forward or reverse doesn't matter, you're building a DNS server to service them and then configuring Untangle to use AdGuard for those specific zones. Also assuming that zone is consistent, you can configure Untangle via DNS's Domain's to forward requests for those zones to the AdGuard as well, which allows Untangle to use AdGuard for those specific zones. If you want forward and reverse custom lookups to work while preserving DNS over HTTPs, you need to configure AdGuard to do all that, presumably defining a zone for this stuff and putting rules in there. Though that will cost you your DNS over HTTPs functionality, but it is easy to do. If you want them to work, configure AdGuard to use Untangle for DNS.
Your static DNS entries on Untangle will NOT work after this change. This change doesn't impact your modules and now they work at all, it just eliminates a potentially catastrophic DNS loop. What matters are the HTTP/HTTPs sessions are passing through Untangle. BUT they do not use it to actually filter. To make sure my reverse-lookup still works I added the following to AdGuard: So does webfilter, Intrusion Prevention, Bandwidth Control and so on still work?Īnd can I still see that client x visits test1.xyz (that has the same IP as test2.xyz)?ĭo my Static DNS Entries at Untangle still work for my clients?
LAN DHCP's tells the clients to use 10.8.1.10 (AdGuard)ĪdGuard uses the cloudflare and quad9 DNSSec as upstream?Ĭan Untangle still detect and filter all its stuff? In the end, clients behind Untangle simply never use Untangle for DNS.So, If I understand Correctly: This would be DHCP configuration adjustments along with some work with the firewall. Then have rules that force the clients behind Untangle to use the AdGuard server. It's far cleaner, to have Untangle utilize unfiltered DNS, which is actually rather important for Web Filter and other modules to work correctly. Stuff like that creates inconsistent nightmares that make my hair fall out. The Pihole can't work without Untangle, and the Untangle can't work without the Pihole. A circular dependence where your Untangle server is reliant on a device it's protecting for critical resolution. I'm not a fan of that configuration, it creates a loop in your DNS.